243
Fashion Jobs
L'OREAL GROUP
Head of Advocacy & Influence - l’Oréal Dermatological Beauty - Copenhagen
Permanent · COPENHAGEN
ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES
District Manager (Funen/Jutland)
Permanent · AARHUS
ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES
Handelselev Med Speciale i Digital Handel - E-Commerce
Permanent · COPENHAGEN
ZIZZI
Online Buyer Til Fashion
Permanent · BILLUND
SAMSOE
Logistik Koordinator
Permanent · GLOSTRUP
ONLY
Business Controller
Permanent · BRANDE
ONLY
International Sales Manager
Permanent · BRANDE
JACK & JONES
Konstruktører, Jack & Jones og Jjxx
Permanent · BRANDE
BEST SELLER
Environmental Programme Coordinator
Permanent · KØBENHAVN K
BEST SELLER
Product Owner - Data-Driven Solutions & ai
Permanent · AARHUS
SELECTED FEMME/HOMME
Sales Representative
Permanent · BRANDE
L'OREAL GROUP
Key Account Relationship Specialist
Permanent · COPENHAGEN
SAMSOE
Business Controller (Sql And Data Analytics Specialist)
Permanent · COPENHAGEN
ACE & TATE
Optometrist Copenhagen i NY Østergade
Permanent · COPENHAGEN
VERO MODA
Business Controller
Permanent · AARHUS
VERO MODA
Buyer | Curve
Permanent · AARHUS
ONLY
Demand Planner
Permanent · BRANDE
L'OREAL GROUP
Supply Chain Graduate - l’Oréal Luxe Product Division - Copenhagen
Permanent · COPENHAGEN
KERING EYEWEAR
Kering Eyewear - Lindberg Junior Trade Marketing Manager
Permanent · AARHUS
ESPRIT
Area Manager Multilabel Nordic Women
Permanent · COPENHAGEN
ZIZZI
IT Operations Manager
Permanent · BILLUND
TJX EUROPE
Buying Coordinator
Permanent · COPENHAGEN
Published
Dec 12, 2017
Reading time
2 minutes
Download
Download the article
Print
Text size

Californian court orders H&M to pay for copying Unicolors' fabric

Published
Dec 12, 2017

A jury in California has awarded Unicolors almost $850,000 in its copyright suit against H&M, finding after a trial that the fast fashion giant willfully infringed on the LA-based textile company's fabric pattern.

Unicolors (left); H&M (right)


Unicolors brought the lawsuit in California federal court in April of last year. The Vernon, CA-based textile manufacturer claimed H&M copied its protected pattern for both a skirt and a jacket. A day long trial before a jury resulted in Unicolors being awarded a verdict for $846,720.

While H&M is no stranger to being accused of copyright infringement, Unicolors sits on the opposite end of the spectrum as an entity some are calling a copyright troll. ("Copyright troll" is a spinoff of patent troll, the derogatory classification given to someone who is a registered owner of a patent who pursues frequent legal action to protect their patent far beyond the reasonable market value or significance of the intellectual property.)

To that end, Unicolors filed about 100 similar lawsuits last year alleging copyright infringement of its fabric pattern. Defendants included Nordstrom, Urban Outfitters, Zara, and Ivanka Trump. While retailers occasionally fall victim to copying inspiration too closely, Unicolors has been accused by opposing parties of "legalized extortion."

Despite the harsh words exchanged in legal disputes, very few of these copyright cases go to trial due to expense. It is often more convenient for a company that gets sued to settle.

The recent Unicolors suit against Urban Outfitters was one of the few that went to trial. Urban Outfitters prevailed and was able to show there was no infringement.

The H&M trial had a different result. It revealed that a jury believed H&M had access to the Unicolors fabric design, likely through a converter or shared factory. The jury then agreed with Unicolors that H&M copied their fabric.

While an $850,000 settlement and accompanying legal fees is not going to significantly impact H&M's multi-billion dollar business, the verdict sets an interesting precedent as far as what American juries are willing to tolerate in fashion copyright cases. It will be interesting to see whether H&M appeals the decision or whether it will accept the trial court's verdict.

Copyright © 2024 FashionNetwork.com All rights reserved.